Role Of Economic Freedom in The Research and Development-Productivity Growth Nexus: Panel Dynamic Ordinary Least Square Evidence

Peranan Kebebasan Ekonomi dalam Mempengaruhi Penyelidikan dan Pembangunan dan Peningkatan Produktiviti: Bukti Kajian dengan Panel Dinamik Kuasadua Terkecil Biasa

Authors

  • Nurnaddia Nordin
  • Nurhaiza Nordin
  • Norzalina Zainudin

Keywords:

Domestic and Foreign Research and Development, Economic freedom, Panel Dynamic OLS, Developing countries

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship economic freedom, Research and Development
both domestic and foreign, and productivity growth. The main motivation of the study
is to examine the role of economic freedom as a mediating factor of research and
development on productivity growth. We analyzed 37 selected developing countries,
with data spanning from 2000 to 2010.We adopted the model and framework
introduced Coe and Helpman (1995) whereas this model can be seen as an extension
of Mansfield’s (1984). We employed the Panel Dynamic Ordinary Least Square (PDOLS)
proposed by Stock and Watson (1993) which capture the long run relationship
and the short run relationship to analyze and estimate the model. The finding indicates
that economic freedom positively mediate both domestic and foreign R&D on
productivity growth, but the result indicates higher elasticity value of domestic R&D
comparisons to foreign R&D and the findings is concurrent with most of the past
literatures. Policy marker and government should provide or formulate policy and
ready to reduce their intervention to ensure that country is freer because economic
freedom is one of the main drivers of prosperity and growth.

Kajian ini menilai hubunagan anataran kebebasan ekonomi, Penyelidikan dan

Pembangunan (R&D) bagi dalam dan luar negara dan kadar pertumbuhan

produktiviti. Tujuan utama kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji peranan kebebasan

ekonomi sebagai faktor pengantara bagi R&D ke atas pertumbuhan produktiviti.

Kajian ini menganalisis 37 negara-negara membangun menggunakan data dari tahun

2000 hingga 2010. Model dan rangka kerja yang digunakan adalah merujuk kepada

model yang diperkenalkan oleh Coe dan Helpman (1995) manakala model ini adalah lanjutan daripada model yang diterokai oleh Mansfield (1984). Untuk melihat

hubungan jangka panjang dan juga jangka pendek, Panel Dinamik Kuasadua Terkecil

Biasa (P-DOLS) yang dicadangkan oleh Stock and Watson (1993) digunakan.

Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa kebebasan ekonomi menunjukkan hubungan

yang positif sebagai pengantara kepada R&D bagi dalam dan luar negara terhadap

pertumbuhan produktiviti. Namun, nilai keanjalan bagi R&D dalam negara adalah

lebih tinggi berbanding untuk R&D luar negara dan penemuan ini adalah selari

dengan kebanyakan kajian lepas. Oleh itu, kebebasan ekonomi adalah salah satu

faktor yang menyumbang kepada pertumbuhan produktiviti dan pembuat polisi dan

kerajaan memainkan berperanan yang penting dalam penggubalan dasar atau

campur tangan dalam aktiviti ekonomi, dimana ia akan mempengaruhi kadar

kebebasan ekonomi ini.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge

spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1): 15-30.

Aghion, P. & Howitt. P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.

Econometrica, 60: 323-351.

Ali, A. (1997). Economic Freedom, Democracy and Growth. Journal of private

enterprise, 13: 1-20.

Barro, R. J. (1997). Determinant of economic growth; A Cross Country Empirical

Study, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Barro, R. J. (1999). Inequality, Growth, and Investment. Working Paper no. w7038.

Cambridge Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2006). Complementarity in R&D

cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organization, 28: 401-426.

Berggren, N. (2003). The Benefit of Economic Freedom: A Survey. Independent

Review, 8(2): 193-211.

Journal of Management & Muamalah, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2016

eISSN 2180-1681

Bernstein, J. (1994). International R&D spillover between Industries in Canada and

United States. Industry Canada working Paper series, No.3.

Bernstein, J. & Xiaoyi, Y. (1995). International R&D spillover between Industries in

Canada and Japanese Industries. NBER working Paper series, No.5401.

Calvo, M. B. & Robles, B. S. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Freedom,

and Growth: New Evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political

Economy, 19(3): 529–45.

Coe, D. & Helpman, E., (1995). International R&D Spillovers. European Economic

Review, 39: 859–887.

Coe, D. & Helpman, E. (1993). International R&D Spillovers. National Buraeu of

Economic Research Working Paper, Cambridge, MA, No. 4444.

Coe, D. T. & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D Spillover. NBER Working Paper,

No. 5048.

Cohen, Wesley M. & Klepper, S. (1991). Firm Size versus Diversity in the

Achievement of Technological Advance.

Cohen, W. M. & Klepper, S. (1992). The Tradeoff between Firm Size and Diversity in

the Pursuit of Technological Progress. Small Business Economics, 4(1): 1-14.

Cohen, W. M. & Klepper, S. (1996a). Firm size and the nature of innovation within

industries: the case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics &

Statistics, 78(2): 232–243.

Cohen, W. M., & Richard C. Levin. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market

structure. In R. C. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial

Organization: 1059-1 107. Amsterdam: Elsevier. UNCTAD 2000.

Cole, J. H. (2003). The Contribution of Economic Freedom to World Economic

Growth: 1980–99. Cato Journal, 23(2): 189–99.

Dawson, J. W. (1998). Institutions, Investments and growth: New cross country and

panel data evidence. Economic Inquiry, 36: 603-19.

De Haan, J., Lundstrom, S., & Sturm. J. (2006). Market-Oriented Institutions and

Policies and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey. Journal of Economic

Surveys, 20(2): 157-191.

De Haan, Jakob & Sturm, J. E. (2000). On the relationship between economic freedom

and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16: 215-241.

Depken C. A. & Sonara. R. J. (2005). The asymmetric effects of economic freedom on

International Trade Flows. Journal Economic Literature.

Easton, Steven T., Micheal A. Walker. (1997). Income, Growth and Economic

Freedom. American Economic Review, 87(2): 328-32.

Erken, H., Donselaar, P., & Thurik, R. (2008). Total factor productivity and the role of

entrepreneurship. The JENA Economic Research Papers.

Feld, L. P. & Voight. S. (2002). Economic growth and rule of law. Cross Country

Evidence using a new set of indicators. Paper presented to the public Choice

Society, San Diego, March 22.

Fors, G. (1996). Utilization of R&D, results in home and foreign plants of

multinationals. Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3): 341-345.

Goldsmith, A. A (1995). Democracy, Property rights and growth. Journal of

Development Studies, 32(2): 157-154.

Goldsmith, Arthur A. (1995). Economic Rights and Government in Developing

Countries: Cross National Evidence on Growth and Development. Studies in

Comparative International Development, 32(2): 29-44.

Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to

pro-productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(l): 92-116.

Journal of Management & Muamalah, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2016

eISSN 2180-1681

Griliches, Z. & Lichtenberg, F. (1984). R&D and Productivity Growth at Industry

Level: Is there still a Relationship? in Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents and

Productivity, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Grossman G. & Helpman E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy,

MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Gwartney, J. & Lawson, R. (2005). Economic Freedom of the world 2005 Annual

report. Vancouver, BC. The Fraser Institute.

Gwartney, J. & Lawson, R. & Block Walter. (1996). Economic Freedom of the world;

-1995 Annual report. Vancouver, BC. Fraser Institute.

Haddad, M. & A. Harrison. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign

investment? Evidence form panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development

Economics, 42: 51-74.

Hall. R. E., & Charles, J. J. (1999). Why Do some countries Produce So Much More

Output than Others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1): 83-116.

Hanson, J. R. (2000). Prosperity and Economic Freedom. The Independent Review,

(4): 525-531

Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review,

(4): 519-30.

Hayek, Friedrich A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of

Chicago Press.

Hendry, D. F. (1995). Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holcombe, R. G & Gwartney, J. D. (2010). Unions, Economic Freedom and Growth.

Sato Journal, 30(1).

Islam, S. (1996). Economic freedom, per capita income and economic growth. Applied

Economic Letters, 3: 595-597.

Keefer, P. (1999). Does one fit All? Fitting Economic reforms to Political Institutions.

Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition, 3: 5-14.

Kneller, R., Micheal, F. B., & Norman, G. (1999.) Fiscal Policy and Growth. Evidence

from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74(2): 171-90.

Lichtenberg, F. & B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie. (1998). International R&D

spillovers: A comment. The European Economic Review, 42(8): 1483-1491.

McQuillan, L. J & Murphy, R. P. (2009). The Sizzle of Economic Freedom: How

Economic Freedom Helps You and Why You Should Demand More. Pacific

Research Institute.

Nelson, M. A., & Singh, R. D. (1998). Democracy, Economic Freedom, Fiscal Policy

and Growth in LDC’s: A Fresh Look. Economic Development and Cultural

Change, 46(4): 677-96.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norton, S. W. (1998). Poverty, Property and Human Well-Being: A Cross-National

Study. Cato Journal, 18(2): 233-246.

Olson, Mancur, Naveen, S. & Annad V. Swamy. (2000). Governance and Growth. A

Simple Hypothesis Explaining Cross Country Differences in Productivity

Growth. Public Choice, 102(3-4): 341-364.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653-670.

Ptilik, Hans. (2002). The Path of Liberalization and Economic Growth. Kyklos, 55(1):

-80.

Pourshahabi, F., Mahmoudinia, D. & Soderjani, E. S. (2011). FDI, Human Capital,

Economic Freedom and Growth in OECD Countries. Research Journal of

Internatıonal Studıes, Issue 19.

Journal of Management & Muamalah, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2016

eISSN 2180-1681

Powell, B. (2003). Economic Freedom and Growth. The Case of the Celtic Tiger. Cato

Journal, 22(3): 431-448.

Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long run growth, Journal of Political

Economy, 94: 1002-1037.

Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy,

: 71-102.

Scully, G. (2002). Economic Freedom, Government Policy and the trade Off between

Equity and Economic Growth. Public Choice, 113: 77-96.

Torstensson, J. (1994). Property Rights and Economic Growth: An Empirical Study.

Kyklos, 47(2): 231-247.

Vijayaraghavan, Maya & William. A. W. (2001). Institution and Economic growth:

Emperical Evidence for Cross National Analysis. working paper no. 001302.

Clemson, S. C; Centre of International Trade, Clemsom University.

Weede, E. & Kampf, S. (2002). The Impact of Intelligence and Institutional

improvement on economic growth. Kyklos, 55(3): 361-380.

Williamson, C. R. & Mathers, R. L. (2010). Economic Freedom, Culture, and Growth.

Journal Economic Literature, 43.

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Nordin, N. ., Nordin, N. ., & Zainudin, N. (2016). Role Of Economic Freedom in The Research and Development-Productivity Growth Nexus: Panel Dynamic Ordinary Least Square Evidence: Peranan Kebebasan Ekonomi dalam Mempengaruhi Penyelidikan dan Pembangunan dan Peningkatan Produktiviti: Bukti Kajian dengan Panel Dinamik Kuasadua Terkecil Biasa. Journal of Management and Muamalah , 6(1), 15-34. Retrieved from https://jmm.uis.edu.my.kuisjournal.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/96