Halal Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Siti Hawa Radin Eksan Faculty of Management and Muamalah Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor MALAYSIA

Keywords:

Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs), Halal, Halal Risk Management

Abstract

Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have contributed substantially to developing knowledge of various fields in academic, and discovering new research potential in a systematic way. There is abundant academic writing in the Halal context from supply chain integrity, slaughtering proses, logistics, and consumer behaviour. However, there have made limited contributions to developing knowledge in the halal risk management (HRM) domain. The limitation is due to the ontological and epistemological idiosyncrasies of research in halal risk management, which need to be accounted for when retrieving, selecting, and synthesizing studies in an SLR. Therefore, we propose a new review for SLRs in the halal risk management (HRM) domain based on best practices and halal risk management research's unique attributes. This approach involves exploring existing studies with attention to theoretical boundaries, units of analysis, sources of data, study contexts, definitions and the operationalization of constructs, and research methods to refining or revising existing theory. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on halal risk management research and conduct a content analysis of the same for classification, as well as providing of new potential research in halal risk management (HRM).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M., K. Tan, K. Pawar, and Z. Makhbul. (2014). “Extenuating Food Integrity Risk through Supply Chain Integration: The Case of Halal Food.” Industrial Engineering and Management Systems 13 (2): 154–162. doi:10.7232/ iems.2014.13.2.154.

Buchanan, M. Iyer, R. and Karl, C.A. (1999). “The case study in business research”, Global Research Business.

Bryman, A. (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. Sage Publications, London, pp. 671-89.

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan, & A. Bryman (Eds.). The sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). London: Sage.

DinarStandard. (2020). “State of the Global Islamic Economy Report.” Salaam gateway. Accessed 1 May 2020. https:// ceif.iba.edu.pk/pdf/state-of-global-islamic-economyreport-2019-20.pdf

Dong, Q., and O. Cooper. (2016). “An Orders-of-magnitude AHP Supply Chain Risk Assessment Framework.” International Journal of Production Economics 182: 144–156. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.021.

Elo, S. and Kyngäs, H. (2007), “The qualitative content analysis process”. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 62(1), pp. 107-115

Fadhlur R., A. Absullah, E.Ruddy and Haslinda (2020) “Type of Risk in Halal Food Supply Chain: A Review”. Int. Journal Supply Chain Management .9(4) August 2020

Fuseini, A., T. Knowles, P. Hadley, and S. Wotton. (2016). “Halal Stunning and Slaughter: Criteria for the Assessment of Dead Animals.” Meat Science 119: 132–137. doi:10.1016/j. meatsci.2016.04.033.

Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237

Housyar, M., & Sotudeh, H. (2018). A reflection on the applicability of Google Scholar as a tool for comprehensive retrieval in bibliometric research and systematic reviews. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 16 (2), 1-17.

Herman, S.W. (2015). Google Scholar could be used as stand-alone resource for systematic reviews. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10 (2), 147-149.

Higgins, J.P.T., Altmann, D.G., Sterne, J.A.C. (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions,https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_assessing_risk_of_ bias_in_included_studies.htm (accessed November 2018).

Knight, F.H. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

Lacy, S., Watson, B.R., Riffe, D. and Lovejoy, J. (2015), “Issues and best practices in content analysis”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 92 (4), pp. 791-811.

MacDonald, B. (1975), “Evaluation and the control of education”, in Tawney, D. (Ed.), Evaluation: The State of the Art, Schools Council, London.

Mansur, A., A. Farida, and M. Albab. (2017). “Operation Risk Mitigation On Halal Meat Supply Chain Management.” In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 215, 012027. IOP Science.

Mangla, S., P. Kumar, and M. Barua. (2015). “Risk Analysis in Green Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP Approach: A Case Study.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 104: 375–390. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.001.

Parente, D.H. (1998), “Across the manufacturing-marketing interface classification of significant research”. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 18(12), pp. 1205-1222.

Ritchie, B. and Brindley, C. (2007), “An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement”. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(11), pp. 1398-411.

Robinson, P., Lowe, J. (2015). Literature reviews vs systematic reviews. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 39(2), 103.

Shaffril, H.A.M., Samsuddin, S.F., & Abu Samah, A. (2020). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality and Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

Tieman, M. (2017). “Halal Risk Management: Combining Robustness and Resilience.” Journal of Islamic Marketing 8 (3): 461–475. doi:10.1108/JIMA-06-2015-0041.

Wahyuni, H., I. Vanany, and U. Ciptomulyono. (2019). “Food Safety and Halal Food in the Supply Chain: Review and Bibliometric Analysis.” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management 12 (2): 373. doi:10.3926/jiem.2803.

Wu, T. (2009). Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability: Tools and Methods for Supply Chain Decision Makers. Guildford, Surrey: Springer London

W. Ho, T. Zheng, H. Yildiz, and S. Talluri, “Supply chain risk management: A literature review,” International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), pp. 5031–5069,2015. (15) (PDF) Type of risks in halal food supply chain: a literature review.

Published

2020-11-30

How to Cite

Radin Eksan , S. H. (2020). Halal Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Management and Muamalah , 10(2), 58-70. Retrieved from https://jmm.uis.edu.my.kuisjournal.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/6